CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/A History of Greek Economic ThoughtPublic
Page 108 of 396
Table of Contents

CHAPTER VI ARISTOTLE

Naturally, the philosopher shows no concern for a tax on imports as a means of building up the industry and commerce of his state, since he is especially desirous of limiting both. However, he is not blind to the advantages of export and import trade for a nation,732 but would regulate them with an ethical, rather than an economic purpose.733 His doctrine of exchange as a form of production has been discussed above,734 and will be touched upon further in the following pages. His general criticism of what he terms “false finance” or “chrematistik” (χρηματιστική) remains for more extended treatment.

We have seen that he recognizes the necessity of a limited form of exchange, free from the purpose of gain, and considers such trading to be natural and in accord with that interdependence which nature demands.735 He calls it the very bond of the social organization,736 and even considers international commerce to be necessary for the prosperity of a state.737 We have also seen that he goes so far as to advise the rich in a democracy to give the poor a start in business,738 but that exchange, in its prevalent form, is to him a method of cheatery, in which one gains what the other loses.739

On the basis of this prejudice, he builds his argument for domestic economy (οἰκονομική) as opposed to false finance.740 We will therefore consider his entire theory of this relation at this point, for the term “chrematistik,” though more inclusive than exchange (μεταβλητική), has trade in either goods or money (καπηλική) as its predominating element, and the two terms are often used by him as synonyms. He employs the word χρηματιστική in several significations—usually of unnatural finance, or the art of money-making by exchange of goods or money; sometimes as synonymous with κτητική, the general term for the entire business of acquisition, including both natural and unnatural finance;741 again, of the natural finance, which is a part of domestic economy. His confusion results partly from his futile attempt to separate landed property from general industry and commerce.

108