CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/A History of MathematicsPublic

This text examines the transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern era, highlighting how the fall of Constantinople and the invention of the printing press catalyzed a revival of classical learning. It traces the shift toward scientific inquiry through the rise of pure mathematics and astronomy, detailing the intellectual struggle against established scholastic and ecclesiastical authority.

Page 32 of 219
Table of Contents

Vieta to Descartes

contrary to fact. Hence the supposition is false, and the theorem is established. Fermat applied this method of descent with success in a large number of theorems. By this method Euler, Legendre, Dirichlet, proved several of his enunciations and many other numerical propositions.

A correspondence between Pascal and Fermat relating to a

certain game of chance was the germ of the theory of probabilities, which has since attained a vast growth. Chevalier de Méré proposed to Pascal the fundamental problem, to determine

the probability which each player has, at any given

stage of the game, of winning the game. Pascal and Fermat supposed that the players have equal chances of winning a single point.

The former communicated this problem to Fermat, who

studied it with lively interest and solved it by the theory of combinations, a theory which was diligently studied both by him and Pascal. The calculus of probabilities engaged the attention also of Huygens. The most important theorem

reached by him was that, if A has p chances of winning a sum a, and q chances of winning a sum b, then he may expect to win the sum ap+bqp+q. The next great work on the theory of probability was the Ars conjectandi of Jakob Bernoulli.

Among the ancients, Archimedes was the only one who

attained clear and correct notions on theoretical statics. He

had acquired firm possession of the idea of pressure, which lies at the root of mechanical science. But his ideas slept nearly twenty centuries, until the time of Stevin and Galileo.

Stevin determined accurately the force necessary to sustain a body on a plane inclined at any angle to the horizon. He was in possession of a complete doctrine of equilibrium. While Stevin investigated statics, Galileo pursued principally dynamics. Galileo was the first to abandon the Aristotelian idea that bodies descend more quickly in proportion as they are

heavier; he established the first law of motion; determined

the laws of falling bodies; and, having obtained a clear notion of acceleration and of the independence of different motions, was able to prove that projectiles move in parabolic curves. Up to his time it was believed that a cannon-ball moved forward at first in a straight line and then suddenly fell vertically to the ground. Galileo had an understanding of centrifugal forces, and gave a correct definition of momentum. Though he formulated the fundamental principle of statics, known as the parallelogram of forces, yet he did not fully

recognise its scope. The principle of virtual velocities was partly conceived by Guido Ubaldo (died 1607), and afterwards

more fully by Galileo.

32