you of course will welcome frank, honest criticism. After reading and rereading your said article, I am, against my desire, forced to the following conclusions:
- You are either one of the "System" or are hired by it.
- This article of yours was prepared for the purposes of making two points: (a) Working on the sentiment and passions of the weak, and the women; and (b) diverting public attention and opinion from the real facts at issue, by attacking Mr. Lawson's personal character, which is not up for discussion.
- Your article is full of high-sounding declarations, and void of either logic or common sense.
- In your endeavor to express the wishes of the prejudiced and biassed, you are undoubtedly dishonest with yourself without deceiving the public.
- Your article lacks the ring that carries conviction, either as to your sincerity or the truthfulness of the statements you make.
- The article indicates that you are vainly trying to ape Mr. Lawson's style.
Yours respectfully,
E.