particular form, but it most naturally associates with the representative form, as being best calculated to secure the end for which a nation is at the expense of supporting it.
Various forms of government have affected to style themselves a republic. Poland calls itself a republic, which is an hereditary aristocracy, with what is called an elective monarchy. Holland calls itself a republic, which is chiefly aristocratical, with an hereditary stadtholdership. But the government of America, which is wholly on the system of representation, is the only real Republic, in character and in practice, that now exists.
Its government has no other object than the public business of the nation, and therefore it is properly a republic; and the Americans have taken care that This , and no other, shall always be the object of their government, by their rejecting everything hereditary, and establishing governments on the system of representation only.
Those who have said that a republic is not a form of government calculated for countries of great extent, mistook, in the first place, the business of a government, for a form of government; for the res-publica equally appertains to every extent of territory and population. And, in the second place, if they meant anything with respect to form , it was the simple democratical form, such as was the mode of government in the ancient democracies, in which there was no representation.
The case, therefore, is not, that a republic cannot be extensive, but that it cannot be extensive on the simple democratical form; and the question naturally presents itself, “What is the best form of government for conducting the Res-Publica , or the Public Business of a nation, after it becomes too extensive and populous for the simple democratical form?” It cannot be monarchy, because monarchy is subject to an objection of the same amount to which the simple democratical form was subject.