CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/The Iron HeelPublic

This book presents the Everhard Manuscript, a personal account written by Avis Everhard regarding the revolutionary activities of her husband, Ernest Everhard. The narrative details the turbulent period between 1912 and 1932, capturing the psychology and social conditions of the era through the perspective of those involved in the movement.

Page 77 of 331
Table of Contents

CHAPTER V. THE PHILOMATHS

helped, weeping and laughing, out of the room. It was just as well, for there was worse to follow.

“Don’t take my word for it,” Ernest continued, when the interruption had been led away. “Your own authorities with one unanimous voice will prove you stupid. Your own hired purveyors of knowledge will tell you that you are wrong. Go to your meekest little assistant instructor of sociology and ask him what is the difference between Rousseau’s theory of the return to nature and the theory of socialism; ask your greatest orthodox bourgeois political economists and sociologists; question through the pages of every text-book written on the subject and stored on the shelves of your subsidized libraries; and from one and all the answer will be that there is nothing congruous between the return to nature and socialism. On the other hand, the unanimous affirmative answer will be that the return to nature and socialism are diametrically opposed to each other. As I say, don’t take my word for it. The record of your stupidity is there in the books, your own books that you never read. And so far as your stupidity is concerned, you are but the exemplar of your class.

77