CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/The Pinkerton Labor SpyPublic

This work examines the operational methods of the Pinkerton Detective Agency and its involvement in labor disputes, specifically the Cripple Creek strike and the legal case against Moyer, Haywood, and Pettibone. The author details the activities of various undercover operatives and argues that the agency functions as an essential tool for the capitalist class in its conflict with organized labor.

Page 132 of 330
Table of Contents

Chapter XL

In this way the State administration evaded the issue.

Now let us see what the civil authorities did with Poole. On January 9th, 1904, he was brought before a justice of the peace at Cripple Creek. An attorney for the Mine Owners' Association asked for a continuation, on the grounds that the prosecution needed more time in which to gather evidence.

The justice said that Poole had been held in custody long enough for the gathering of any amount of evidence, and ordered his immediate release.

The Pinkerton Labor Spy. 99

Poole was accordingly released, and neither the military nor anyone else molested him further.

Since the State at no time had one iota of evidence connecting Victor Poole with any crime, why did they deprive him of his liberty for so many weeks in the first place, and why did Governor Peabody, who knew the exact status of the case, suspend the writ of habeas corpus in this case?

Why, indeed?

132