CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/A History of MathematicsPublic

This text examines the transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern era, highlighting how the fall of Constantinople and the invention of the printing press catalyzed a revival of classical learning. It traces the shift toward scientific inquiry through the rise of pure mathematics and astronomy, detailing the intellectual struggle against established scholastic and ecclesiastical authority.

Page 14 of 219
Table of Contents

The Renaissance

most formidable during the seventeenth century. Among the first to revive this problem was the German Cardinal Nicolaus Cusanus (died 1464), who had the reputation of being a great

logician. His fallacies were exposed to full view by Regiomontanus.

As in this case, so in others, every quadrator of note raised up an opposing mathematician: Orontius was met

by Buteo and Nonius; Joseph Scaliger by Vieta, Adrianus

Romanus, and Clavius; A. Quercu by Peter Metius. Two

mathematicians of Netherlands, Adrianus Romanus and Ludolph

van Ceulen, occupied themselves with approximating to the ratio between the circumference and the diameter. The former carried the value π to 15, the latter to 35, places. The

value of π is therefore often named "Ludolph's number." His

performance was considered so extraordinary, that the numbers were cut on his tomb-stone in St. Peter's church-yard, at Leyden. Romanus was the one who propounded for solution that equation of the forty-fifth degree solved by Vieta. On receiving Vieta's solution, he at once departed for Paris, to make his acquaintance with so great a master. Vieta proposed to him the Apollonian problem, to draw a circle touching

three given circles. "Adrianus Romanus solved the problem by the intersection of two hyperbolas; but this solution did not possess the rigour of the ancient geometry. Vieta caused him

to see this, and then, in his turn, presented a solution which had all the rigour desirable."25 Romanus did much toward simplifying spherical trigonometry by reducing, by means of

certain projections, the 28 cases in triangles then considered to only six.

Mention must here be made of the improvements of the Julian calendar. The yearly determination of the movable

feasts had for a long time been connected with an untold

amount of confusion. The rapid progress of astronomy led to the consideration of this subject, and many new calendars were proposed. Pope Gregory XIII. convoked a large number of mathematicians, astronomers, and prelates, who decided upon the adoption of the calendar proposed by the Jesuit Lilius Clavius. To rectify the errors of the Julian calendar

it was agreed to write in the new calendar the 15th of October immediately after the 4th of October of the year 1582. The Gregorian calendar met with a great deal of opposition both among scientists and among Protestants. Clavius, who ranked high as a geometer, met the objections of the former most ably and effectively; the prejudices of the latter passed away with time.

The passion for the study of mystical properties of numbers descended from the ancients to the moderns. Much was written on numerical mysticism even by such eminent men as Pacioli and Stifel. The Numerorum Mysteria of Peter

14