CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/A History of MathematicsPublic

This text examines the transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern era, highlighting how the fall of Constantinople and the invention of the printing press catalyzed a revival of classical learning. It traces the shift toward scientific inquiry through the rise of pure mathematics and astronomy, detailing the intellectual struggle against established scholastic and ecclesiastical authority.

Page 23 of 219
Table of Contents

Vieta to Descartes

In geometry, the determination of the areas of curvilinear

figures was diligently studied at this period. Paul Guldin

(1577–1643), a Swiss mathematician of considerable note, re-discovered the following theorem, published in his Centrobaryca, which has been named after him, though first found in the Mathematical Collections of Pappus: The volume of a solid of revolution is equal to the area of the generating figure, multiplied by the circumference described by the centre of gravity. We shall see that this method excels that of Kepler and Cavalieri in following a more exact and natural

course; but it has the disadvantage of necessitating the determination of the centre of gravity, which in itself may be a more difficult problem than the original one of finding the

volume. Guldin made some attempts to prove his theorem, but Cavalieri pointed out the weakness of his demonstration.

Johannes Kepler (1571–1630) was a native of Würtemberg

and imbibed Copernican principles while at the University of Tübingen. His pursuit of science was repeatedly interrupted by war, religious persecution, pecuniary embarrassments, frequent changes of residence, and family troubles. In 1600 he became for one year assistant to the Danish astronomer, Tycho Brahe, in the observatory near Prague. The relation between

the two great astronomers was not always of an agreeable character. Kepler's publications are voluminous. His first attempt to explain the solar system was made in 1596, when he thought he had discovered a curious relation between the five regular solids and the number and distance of the planets.

The publication of this pseudo-discovery brought him much fame. Maturer reflection and intercourse with Tycho Brahe

and Galileo led him to investigations and results more worthy of

his genius–-"Kepler's laws." He enriched pure mathematics

as well as astronomy. It is not strange that he was interested in the mathematical science which had done him so much service; for "if the Greeks had not cultivated conic sections,

Kepler could not have superseded Ptolemy."11 The Greeks never dreamed that these curves would ever be of practical use; Aristæus and Apollonius studied them merely to satisfy their intellectual cravings after the ideal; yet the conic sections assisted Kepler in tracing the march of the planets in their elliptic orbits. Kepler made also extended use of logarithms

and decimal fractions, and was enthusiastic in diffusing a knowledge of them. At one time, while purchasing wine, he was struck by the inaccuracy of the ordinary modes of determining the contents of kegs. This led him to the study of the volumes of solids of revolution and to the publication of the Stereometria Doliorum in 1615. In it he deals first with the

solids known to Archimedes and then takes up others. Kepler

23