CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/A History of MathematicsPublic

This text examines the transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern era, highlighting how the fall of Constantinople and the invention of the printing press catalyzed a revival of classical learning. It traces the shift toward scientific inquiry through the rise of pure mathematics and astronomy, detailing the intellectual struggle against established scholastic and ecclesiastical authority.

Page 30 of 219
Table of Contents

Vieta to Descartes

times of Diophantus and the Hindoos until the beginning of

the seventeenth century. But the illustrious period we are now considering produced men who rescued this science from the realm of mysticism and superstition, in which it had been so long imprisoned; the properties of numbers began again to be studied scientifically. Not being in possession of the Hindoo indeterminate analysis, many beautiful results of the Brahmins had to be re-discovered by the Europeans. Thus a solution in integers of linear indeterminate equations was re-discovered by the Frenchman Bachet de Méziriac (1581–1638),

who was the earliest noteworthy European Diophantist. In 1612 he published Problèmes plaisants et délectables qui se font par les nombres, and in 1621 a Greek edition of Diophantus with notes. The father of the modern theory of numbers is Fermat. He was so uncommunicative in disposition, that he

generally concealed his methods and made known his results only. In some cases later analysts have been greatly puzzled in the attempt of supplying the proofs. Fermat owned a copy of Bachet's Diophantus, in which he entered numerous marginal notes. In 1670 these notes were incorporated in a new edition of Diophantus, brought out by his son. Other theorems on numbers, due to Fermat, were published in his Opera varia (edited by his son) and in Wallis's Commercium epistolicum

of 1658. Of the following theorems, the first seven are found in the marginal notes:–-

(1) xn+yn=zn is impossible for integral values of x, y, and z, when n>2. Remark: "I have found for this a truly wonderful proof, but the margin is too small to hold it." Repeatedly was this theorem made the prize question of learned societies. It has given rise to investigations of great interest and difficulty on the part of Euler, Lagrange,

Dirichlet, and Kummer.

(2) A prime of the form 4n+1 is only once the hypothenuse

of a right triangle; its square is twice; its cube is three times, etc. Example: 52=32+42; 252=152+202=72+242; 1252=752+1002=352+1202=442+1172.

(3) A prime of the form 4n+1 can be expressed once, and

only once, as the sum of two squares. Proved by Euler.

(4) A number composed of two cubes can be resolved into two other cubes in an infinite multiplicity of ways.

(5) Every number is either a triangular number or the sum of two or three triangular numbers; either a square or the

sum of two, three, or four squares; either a pentagonal number or the sum of two, three, four, or five pentagonal numbers; similarly for polygonal numbers in general. The proof of this and other theorems is promised by Fermat in a future work which never appeared. This theorem is also given, with others, in a letter of 1637(?) addressed to Pater Mersenne.

30