*Napier to Blunt, November 6th*: "You seem to be doubtful about the *acte d'accusation*. We have not had it officially communicated. It is not proposed by the prosecution to frame it until the close of the evidence. But in substance it is fairly stated in a telegram I think to the 'Times': "(1) The abuse of the White Flag. "(2) Complicity in massacres and pillage, June 11. "(3) Complicity in destruction by fire of the city. "(4) Carrying war into territory of the Sultan. "(5) General acts of mutiny and rebellion against the Khedive and the Sultan."
*Broadley to Blunt, November 7th (telegraphed)*: "If you don't mind expense great success sure—see my yesterday's letter. I shall crush Tewfik and his crew past hope of redemption."
*Napier to Blunt, November 10th*: "I have seen Dufferin to-day. He received me most kindly, though he declined to enter on business at once. He had only just received his instructions. Broadley and I are to meet him to-morrow. "There seems to be a desire to burk inquiry into the rebellion question. The Government and all the papers are pledged to the ridiculous rebel cry, the one of all others that incenses me most. It is an old trick that has been played in Afghanistan, the Cape, and elsewhere. Any one can see that it may be smashed into a cocked hat at once.... Proposals for a compromise must come from the other side, must be put in writing, and must contain all that you claim—indeed I think they ought to amount to unconditional surrender. Of this of course more fully afterwards. You may be assured that we will not consent to anything without communication with you, and fullest deliberation."