CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/The ABC of CommunismPublic
Page 85 of 538
Table of Contents

COMMUNISM AND THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT

communist society. Under communism people receive a many-sided culture, and find themselves at home in various branches of production: to-day I work in an administrative capacity, I reckon up how many felt boots or how many French rolls must be produced during the following month; to-morrow I shall be working in a soap factory, next month perhaps in a steam laundry, and the month after in an electric power station. This will be possible when all the members of society have been suitably educated.

20. Distribution in the communist System.

The communist method of production presupposes in addition that production is not for the market, but for use. Under communism, it is no longer the individual manufacturer or the individual peasant who produces; the work of production is effected by the gigantic cooperative as a whole. In consequence of this change, we no longer have commodities, but only products. These products are not exchanged one for another; they are neither bought nor sold. They are simply stored in the communal warehouses, and are subsequently delivered to those who need them. In such conditions, money will no longer be required. “How can that be?” some of you will ask. “In that case one person will get too much and another too little. What sense is there in such a method of distribution?” The answer is as follows. At first, doubtless, and perhaps for twenty or thirty years, it will be necessary to have various regulations. Maybe certain products will only be supplied to those persons who have a special entry in their work-book or on their work-card. Subsequently, when communist society has been consolidated and fully developed, no such regulations will be needed. There will be an ample quantity of all products, our present wounds will long since have been healed, and everyone will be able to get just as much as he needs. “But will not people find it to their interest to take more than they need?” Certainly not. To-day, for example, no one thinks it worth while when he wants one seat in a tram,

85