CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/On The Principles of Political Economy, and TaxationPublic
Page 143 of 421
Table of Contents

CHAPTER VIII.

all encouragement to import foreign goods would cease. Thus, suppose we imported goods which cost 100 l. abroad, and which sold for 120 l. here, we should cease to import them, when the value of money had so risen in England, that they would only sell for 100 l. here: this however could never happen. The motive which determines us to import a commodity, is the discovery of its relative cheapness abroad: it is the comparison of its natural price abroad, with its natural price at home. If a country exports hats, and imports cloth, it does so because it can obtain more cloth by making hats, and exchanging them for cloth, than if it made the cloth itself. If the rise of raw produce occasions any increased cost of production in making hats, it would occasion also an increased cost in making cloth. If therefore both commodities were made at home, they would both rise. One, however, being a commodity which we import, would not rise, neither would it fall, when the value of money rose; for by not falling, it would regain its natural relation to the exported commodity. The rise of raw produce makes a hat rise from 30 to 33 shillings, or 10 per cent.: the same cause if we manufactured cloth, would make it rise from 20 s. to 22 s. per yard. This rise does not destroy the relation between cloth and hats; a hat was, and continues to be, worth one yard and a half of cloth. But if we import cloth, its price will continue uniformly at 20 s. per yard, unaffected first by the fall, and then by the rise in the value of money; whilst hats, which had risen from 30 s. to 33 s. , will again fall from 33 s. to 30 s. , at which point the relation between cloth and hats will be restored.

To simplify the consideration of this subject, I have been supposing that a rise in the value of raw materials would affect, in an equal proportion, all home commodities; that if the effect on one were to raise it 10 per cent., it would raise all 10 per cent.; but as the value of commodities is very differently made up of raw material and labour; as some commodities, for instance all those made from the metals, would be unaffected by the rise of raw produce from the surface of the earth, it is evident that there would be the greatest variety in the effects produced

143