| if the labourers had | 25 |
|---|---|
| The landlords | 25 |
| And the capitalists | 25 |
| —— | |
| 100 |
And if, after these commodities were doubled in quantity, of every 100
| The labourers had only | 22 |
|---|---|
| The landlords | 22 |
| And the capitalists | 22 |
| —— | |
| 100 |
In that case I should say, that wages and rent had fallen, and profits risen; though in consequence of the abundance of commodities, the quantity paid to the labourer and landlord would have increased in the proportion of 25 to 44. Wages are to be estimated by their real value, viz. by the quantity of labour and capital employed in producing them, and not by their nominal value either in coats, hats, money, or corn. Under the circumstances I have just supposed, commodities would have fallen to half their former value; and, if money had not varied, to half their former price also. If then in this medium, which had not varied in value, the wages of the labourer should be found to have fallen, it will not the less be a real fall, because they might furnish him with a greater quantity of cheap commodities, than his former wages.