Camargo intimates that several Tlascalan chiefs of the expedition testified
to the feat. Hist. Tlax., 168; and Gomara adds that several followers
tried to imitate it, but failed, and were drowned. Hist. Mex., 160. Contradictory
as Bernal Diaz is about the incidents of the night, he strenuously
insists that the channel was examined during the following siege and found
to be too wide and too deep to allow of such a leap. Hist. Verdad., 107. This
solitary denial of a story which has been adopted by almost every writer,
from Oviedo to Prescott, finds support in testimony during the hero’s residencia,
wherein it is distinctly stated that he crossed the channel on a fixed
beam. His own testimony gives assent to the charge so formulated, although
hitherto he had no doubt allowed the other version to be believed. Ramirez,
Proceso, 4, 53, 68 et seq.
‘Durò poco este nombre, pues tampoco les convenia à los muertos, que
iban cargados de Oro.’ Monarq. Ind., i. 504. Zamacois describes the site as
he found it not long ago. Hist. Méj., iii. 421-3. Bernal Diaz implies that
the ‘martyr’ name was given in honor of those captured and sacrificed during
the siege, a year later. Hist. Verdad., 153.