Suppose now that this wave strikes a reflecting surface, e.g., the surface of an absolute conductor (metal) of infinitely 4 large conductivity. In such a conductor even an infinitely small electric field-strength produces a finite conduction current; hence the electric field-strength in it must be always and everywhere infinitely small. For simplicity we also suppose the conductor to be non-magnetizable, i.e., we assume the magnetic induction in it to be equal to the magnetic field-strength , just as is the case in a vacuum.
If we place the -axis of a right-handed coordinate system along the normal of the surface directed toward the interior of the conductor, the -axis is the normal of incidence. We place the plane in the plane of incidence and take this as the plane of the figure ([fig:4]Fig. 4). Moreover, we can also, without
any restriction of generality, place the -axis in the plane of the figure, so that the -axis coincides with the -axis (directed from the figure toward the observer). Let the common origin of the two coordinate systems lie in the surface. If finally represents the angle of incidence, the coordinates with and without accent are related to each other by the following equations:
By the same transformation we may pass from the components of the electric or magnetic field-strength in the first coordinate system to their components in the second system. Performing this transformation the following values are obtained from [eqn:(54)] (54) for the components of the electric and magnetic field-strengths of the incident wave in the coordinate system without accent, $\mathsf{E}{x} &= -\sin\theta · f \qquad & \mathsf{H}} &= \phantom{-}\sin\theta · g \ \mathsf{E{y} &= \phantom{-}\cos\theta · f & \mathsf{H}} &= -\cos\theta · g \ \mathsf{E{z} &= g & \mathsf{H} &= f.
\Label[eqn]{(55)}\tag*{\upshape (55)}$ Herein the argument of the functions and is