⁠—that it vulgarizes body and soul⁠—is not quite unfamiliar? And that consequently the modern, noisy, time-engrossing, conceited, foolishly proud laboriousness educates and prepares for ā€œunbeliefā€ more than anything else? Among these, for instance, who are at present living apart from religion in Germany, I find ā€œfreethinkersā€ of diversified species and origin, but above all a majority of those in whom laboriousness from generation to generation has dissolved the religious instincts; so that they no longer know what purpose religions serve, and only note their existence in the world with a kind of dull astonishment. They feel themselves already fully occupied, these good people, be it by their business or by their pleasures, not to mention the ā€œFatherland,ā€ and the newspapers, and their ā€œfamily dutiesā€; it seems that they have no time whatever left for religion; and above all, it is not obvious to them whether it is a question of a new business or a new pleasure⁠—for it is impossible, they say to themselves, that people should go to church merely to spoil their tempers.

133