CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/The International Jew, Volume II: Jewish Activities in the United StatesPublic

This volume continues a series of articles originally published in The Dearborn Independent that examine the influence of Jewish leaders in the United States. The text attempts to correlate these activities with the principles outlined in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, focusing specifically on topics such as education, religion, and the entertainment industry.

Page 220 of 366
Table of Contents

Section 1

At the present time a cleaning of public library shelves is proceeding in a number of cities to prevent the public securing books which public money has bought—the objection to the books being that they discuss Jews as they are. All works in praise of Jews are spared.

  1. Prohibition of the term “Christian” or the use of the phrase “state, religion and nationality” in any public advertisement, as being an invasion of Jewish rights and a discrimination against Jews.

Louis Marshall, as president of the American Jewish Committee, obtained apologies from Charles M. Schwab, as director of the United States Shipping Board; Benjamin Strong, governor of the Federal Reserve Bank and head of the Liberty Loan Com¬ mittee; Secretary McAdoo and Secretary of War THE JEWISH DEMAND FOR “RIGHTS" IN AMERICA 159 Baker, because of the use of the term “Christian” in help wanted advertisements inserted in newspapers by their subordinates.

The Jews succeeded in obtaining the withdrawal of the Junior Plattsburg Manual, used by students in officers’ training camps, because it contained the phrase “the ideal officer is a Christian gentleman,”

which the Jews construed to be an infringement of their rights.

The Kehillah in its report for 1920 stated that several important New York newspapers, having been informed by it that the term “Christian” had appeared in the help wanted advertisements of mercantile firms, the owners of the newspapers sent in their apologies, and promised stricter censorship in the future.

The Jews do not consider the use of the term “Jews” in help wanted advertisements as a discrim¬ ination against non-Jews, and Jewish mercantile houses continue its use in their advertisements in the New York Times and other Jewish-owned dailies.

220