CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/The International Jew, Volume II: Jewish Activities in the United StatesPublic

This volume continues a series of articles originally published in The Dearborn Independent that examine the influence of Jewish leaders in the United States. The text attempts to correlate these activities with the principles outlined in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, focusing specifically on topics such as education, religion, and the entertainment industry.

Page 78 of 366
Table of Contents

Section 1

“I explained to him as earnestly as I could that I was very deeply concerned about the necessity of the mobilization of the industries of the country. The President listened very attentively and graciously, as he always does * * * and the next thing I heard— some months afterward * * * my attention was brought to this Council of National Defense. Secre¬ tary Baker brought it to my attention. This was the first time I had met the Secretary of War. He asked me what I thought of it.”

Mr. Graham—“That was before the bill was passed; before it became a law?”

Mr. Baruch—“I think it was. I am not certain about that. I said I would like to have something different.”

This is rather important. A council is a council. Mr. Baruch wanted something different. Eventually he did get something different. He got the President so to change matters as to make Mr. Baruch the most powerful man in the war. The Council of National Defense eventually became the merest side show. It was not a Council of Americans that ran the war, it was an autocracy headed by a Jew, with Jews at every strategic point down the line. What Mr. Baruch did was very masterly, but it was not in the American manner. He did what he set out to do, but it is seri¬ ously to be questioned whether any man ought to have done what he did, and probably no one but a member of his race would have wanted to do it.

“DISRAELI OF AMERICA”—A JEW OF SUPER-POWER 63 Mr. Graham—“Did the President express any opinion about the advisability of adopting the scheme you proposed?”

78