The proof that these articles have contained facts and only facts is found in the failure of the Jewish spokesmen to show any one of them .to be false. The record stands that way—not one disproof. The reason for the record is this: when only facts *are sought, and are subjected to the tests, only facts are found. If, however, one embarks on a “campaign” whose pur¬ pose is to besmirch an opponent or create a prejudice, one’s partisan zeal may induce him to accept as facts what is merely probability. These articles, however, do not constitute a campaign. They are the lighting of lamps here and there about the country, in this industry and that, in corners heretofore kept dark by those who should serve more faithfully on the watchtower of the Press.
What The Dearborn Independent has said could have had no weight at all, had not the people been able to see the same facts all about them. It is not information, but illumination, that has given these articles the importance they have found among hun¬ dreds of thousands of readers.
The Jewish response to these articles has in one way been gratifying, and in another way quite disappointing.
The Jewish response has been gratifying in that it has furnished substantial proof of all the statements made in The Dearborn Independent. This journal has no doubt of the truth of its statements, and is pos¬ sessed of a very substantial reserve of evidence, but none the less the corroborative evidence produced by the Jewish leaders themselves in endeavoring to meet the issue is appreciated. There is no reason to believe that this was an intentional contribution on the part of Jewish leaders; it was simply impossible for them to move without revealing further evidence.
It is quite well known what is the position of Jew¬ ish leaders today: it is one of fear. For once they themselves are possessed with the fear of the unknown.