I Current socialism is an animus of dissent from received traditions. The degree and the direction of this dissent varies greatly, but it is, within the socialist scheme of thought, agreed that the institutional forms of the past are unfit for the work of the future.'
The socialistic disaffection has been set down
All this appUea ta anarchlam as well ta to BOcialluQ ; almilulr to wvenl minor cat«goriM of dlasentienu. In their negaljre^ propoaala tbe soclailiti uid aoBrchlstA are fairly agreed- It la in the melaphrIc&l piMtuIaue of their protest and iu their coostrucCive aims that they part company. Of the two, Uie soclaJiaW are more widely out of toach with tbe eBtabllebed order. They are aiao mure bopeluaaly negativD and deatructWe In tbclr IdeaU, as seen from tbe standpoint of tbe utablUbed order. Tbia applies to the later Bocialista rather tban b the earlier, and it appUea, of course, only to the lower-clasa, "demo oralio " aoclallsU, not to the Bo-called slate and Christian sociallatB. I Anarchism proceeds on natural-rights ground, and in accordingly la touch with tbe postulates of the existing property arraugemeDla U that extent. It is a more unmitigated working out of Uie same pOBtulatfls. It la a lyatem of " natural liberty ' unquallQed to the exi BTeD of not admitting prescriptive ownership. Its basis is a (dlrinely
CIVILIZATION AND THE MACHINE PROCESS 339
to envy, class hatred, discontent with their own lot by comparison with that of others, and to a mistaken view of their own interests. This criti- '