ā€œI’ve heard so. Well, we’ll leave that question just now. Why am I a scandalmonger? Why did she call me a scandalmonger? And mind, after she had heard every word I had to tell her, and had asked all sorts of questions besides⁠—but such is the way of women. For her sake I entered into relations with Rogojin⁠—an interesting man! At her request I arranged a personal interview between herself and Nastasia Philipovna. Could she have been angry because I hinted that she was enjoying Nastasia Philipovna’s ā€˜leavings’? Why, I have been impressing it upon her all this while for her own good. Two letters have I written her in that strain, and I began straight off today about its being humiliating for her. Besides, the word ā€˜leavings’ is not my invention. At all events, they all used it at Gania’s, and she used it herself. So why am I a scandalmonger? I see⁠—I see you are tremendously amused, at this moment! Probably you are laughing at me and fitting those silly lines to my case⁠—

1607