the Cellularpathologie being just the opposite, ãJedes Thier erscheint als eine Summe vitaler Einheiten, von denen jede den vollen Charakter des Lebens an sich trûÊgt.ã
Hofmeister and Sachs have taught us that in the plant the growth of the mass, the growth of the organ, is the primary fact, that ãcell formation is a phenomenon very general in organic life, but still only of secondary significance.ã ãComparative embryologyã says Whitman, ãreminds us at every turn that the organism dominates cell-formation, using for the same purpose one, several, or many cells, massing its material and directing its movements and shaping its organs, as if cells did not exist63.ã So Rauber declared that, in the whole world of organisms, ãdas Ganze liefert die Theile, nicht die Theile das Ganze: letzteres setzt die Theile zusammen, nicht diese jenes64.ã And on the botanical side De Bary has summed up the matter in an aphorism, ãDie Pflanze bildet Zellen, nicht die Zelle bildet Pflanzen.ã
Discussed almost wholly from the concrete, or morphological point of view, the question has for the most part been made to turn on whether actual protoplasmic continuity can be demonstrated between one cell and another, whether the organism be an actual reticulum, or syncytium. But from the dynamical point of view the question is much simpler. We then deal not with material continuity, not with little bridges of connecting protoplasm, but with a continuity of forces, a comprehensive field of force, which runs through and through the entire organism and is by no means restricted in its passage to a protoplasmic continuum. And such a continuous field of force, somehow shaping the whole organism, independently of the number, magnitude and form of the individual cells, which enter, like a froth, into its fabric, seems to me certainly and obviously to exist. As Whitman says, ãthe fact that physiological unity is not broken by cell-boundaries is confirmed in so many ways that it must be accepted as one of the fundamental truths of biology65.ã