CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/On Growth and FormPublic
Page 41 of 959
Table of Contents

CHAPTER II. ON MAGNITUDE

development of Crepidula (a little American 〜slipper-limpet,〝 now much at home on our own oyster-beds), Conklin37 has succeeded in rearing dwarf and giant individuals, of which the latter may be as much as twenty-five times as big as the former. But nevertheless, the individual cells, of skin, gut, liver, muscle, and of all the other tissues, are just the same size in one as in the other,〔in dwarf and in giant38. Driesch has laid particular stress upon this principle of a 〜fixed cell-size.〝

We get an excellent, and more familiar illustration of the same principle in comparing the large brain-cells or ganglion-cells, both of the lower and of the higher animals39.

A set of diagrams comparing the relative sizes of nerve cells from animals ranging in size from an elephant to a mouse.

In Fig. 1 we have certain identical nerve-cells taken from various mammals, from the mouse to the elephant, all represented on the same scale of magnification; and we see at once that they are all of much the same order of magnitude. The nerve-cell of the elephant is about twice that of the mouse in linear dimensions, and therefore about eight times greater in volume, or mass. But making some allowance for difference of shape, the linear dimensions of the elephant are to those of the mouse in a ratio certainly not less than one to fifty; from which it would follow that the bulk of the larger animal is something like 125,000 times that of the less. And it also follows, the size of the nerve-cells being {37} about as eight to one, that, in corôÙreôÙsponôÙding parts of the nervous system of the two animals, there are more than 15,000 times as many individual cells in one as in the other. In short we may (with Enriques) lay it

41