wall of the quadrant apôÙproxôÙiôÙmateôÙly in the
proportions of three to seven; and thirdly, we see that of the eight cells (four triangular and four oblong) into which the whole egg is now divided, the four which we have called oblong now proceed to divide by partitions transverse to their long axes, or roughly parallel to the periphery of the egg.
The question how the other, or triangular, portion of the divided quadrant will next divide leads us to another well-defined problem, which is only a slight extension, making allowance for the circular arcs, of that elementary problem of the triangle we have already considered. We know now that an entire quadrant must divide (so that its bisecting wall shall have the least possible area) by means of an anticlinal partition, but how about any smaller sectors of circles? It is obvious in the case of a small prismatic {364} sector, such as that shewn in Fig. 149, that a periclinal partition is the smallest by which we can possibly bisect the cell; we want, accordingly, to know the limits below which the periclinal partition is always the best, and above which the anticlinal arc, as in the case of the whole quadrant, has the advantage in regard to smallness of surface area.
This may be easily determined; for the preceding inôÙvesôÙtiôÙgaôÙtion is a perfectly general one, and the results hold good for sectors of any other arc, as well as for the quadrant, or arc of 90ô¯. That is to say, the length of the partition-wall MP is always determined by the angle ö¡, according to our equation MP =ã₤aã₤ö¡ã₤cotã₤ö¡; and the angle ö¡ has a definite relation to öÝ, the angle of arc.
Moreover, in the case of the periclinal boundary, RS (Fig. 147) (or ab, Fig. 149), we know that, if it bisect the