Mark because there was, in the Middle Ages, a popular belief that the young of the lion was born dead, and after three days was awakened to vitality by the breath of its sire; some authors, however, represent the lion as vivifying his young, not by his breath, but by his roar. In either case the application is the same; the revival of the young lion was considered as symbolical of the resurrection, and Mark was commonly called the ā€˜historian of the resurrection.’ Another commentator observes that Mark begins his Gospel with ā€˜roaring,ā€™ā ā€”ā€˜the voice of one crying in the wilderness’; and ends it fearfully with a curseā ā€”ā€˜He that believeth not shall be damned’; and that, therefore, his appropriate attribute is the most terrible of beasts, the lion.

ā€œLuke has the

3917