However this might be (and naturally he had not taken the liberty of going direct to the colonel for his information), my neighbour had paid Saint-Loup the compliment of telling him⁠—in the tone in which a Catholic lady might tell a Jewish lady that her parish priest denounced the pogroms in Russia and might openly admire the generosity of certain Israelites⁠—that their colonel was not, with regard to Dreyfusism⁠—to a certain kind of Dreyfusism, at least⁠—the fanatical, narrow opponent that he had been made out to be.

ā€œI am not surprised,ā€ was Saint-Loup’s comment; ā€œfor he’s a sensible man. But in spite of that he is blinded by the prejudices of his caste, and above all by his clericalism. Now,ā€ he turned to me, ā€œMajor Duroc, the lecturer on military history I was telling you about; there’s a man who is wholeheartedly in support of our views, or so I’m told. And I should have been surprised to hear that he wasn’t, for he’s not only a brilliantly clever man, but a Radical-Socialist and a freemason.ā€

2890