de Guermantes often made. But at other times her appreciation of the picture was different: ā€œI do not care for his painting, but he did once do a good portrait of me.ā€ The former of these judgments was addressed as a rule to people who spoke to the Duchess of her portrait, the other to those who did not refer to it and whom therefore she was anxious to inform of its existence. The former was inspired in her by coquetry, the latter by vanity. ā€œMake a portrait of you look ghastly. Why, then it can’t be a portrait, it’s a falsehood; I don’t know one end of a brush from the other, but I’m sure if I were to paint you, merely putting you down as I see you, I should produce a masterpiece,ā€ said the Princesse de Parme ingenuously. ā€œHe sees me probably as I see myself, without any allurements,ā€ said the Duchesse de Guermantes, with the look, melancholy, modest and coaxing, which seemed to her best calculated to make her appear different from what Elstir had portrayed. ā€œThat portrait ought to appeal to Mme. de Gallardon,ā€ said the Duke. ā€œBecause she knows nothing about pictures?ā€ asked the Princesse de Parme, who knew that Mme.

3969