CodalSearch this book — or all of Codal…⌘K
nydus/War and PeacePublic
Page 1395 of 2640
Table of Contents

1812

what was going on at the staff at headquarters and to consider means of escape from this muddle, indecision, intricacy, and

The men of this party said and thought that what was wrong resulted chiefly from the Emperor’s presence in the army with his military court and from the consequent presence there of an indefinite, conditional, and unsteady fluctuation of relations, which is in place at court but harmful in an army; that a sovereign should reign but not command the army, and that the only way out of the position would be for the Emperor and his court to leave the army; that the mere presence of the Emperor paralyzed the action of fifty thousand men required to secure his personal safety, and that the worst commander in chief, if independent, would be better than the very best one trammeled by the presence and authority of the monarch.

Just at the time Prince Andréy was living unoccupied at Drissa, Shishkóv, the Secretary of State and one of the chief representatives of this party, wrote a letter to the Emperor which Arakchéev and Balashëv agreed to sign. In this letter, availing himself of permission given him by the Emperor to discuss the general course of affairs, he respectfully suggested⁠—on the plea that it was necessary for the sovereign to arouse a warlike spirit in the people of the capital⁠—that the Emperor should leave the army.

That arousing of the people by their sovereign and his call to them to defend their country⁠—the very incitement which was the chief cause of Russia’s triumph in so far as it was produced by the Tsar’s personal presence in Moscow⁠—was suggested to the Emperor, and accepted by him, as a pretext for quitting the army.

X

This letter had not yet been

1395